EFX 2026 6–8 October, Messe Stuttgart: find us in hall 9, stand C29. Read the post →
EN 45545-2 IEC 61249-2-21

Halogen-free

Standard FR-4 reaches its flammability class with brominated flame retardants. Halogen-free laminates get there with phosphorus and metal hydroxides instead — which changes the smoke behaviour in a fire, and changes how the material behaves in your reflow oven.

At a glance
Standard IEC 61249-2-21
Bromine < 900 ppm
Chlorine < 900 ppm
Br + Cl < 1500 ppm
Railway EN 45545-2

"Halogen-free" is a defined threshold rather than an absolute: under 900 ppm bromine, under 900 ppm chlorine, and under 1500 ppm combined, per IEC 61249-2-21. The point is not the residual trace but what replaces the flame retardant — phosphorus compounds and aluminium hydroxide instead of brominated resin.

The reason it matters is fire behaviour in confined spaces. Burning brominated resin produces dense, corrosive, toxic smoke; in a tunnel or a rail carriage that is what harms people before the fire does. EN 45545-2 exists for exactly that scenario, and it is the single most common reason a project specifies halogen-free — environmental policy is usually the second.

What it delivers

[ Overview ]
01

Required for rail

EN 45545-2 is not optional in European rolling stock. If your product goes into a carriage, this material group is where the conversation starts.

02

Lower smoke toxicity

In a fire the material produces markedly less dense and less corrosive smoke — which in an enclosed space is the difference that the standard is written around.

03

Available with High-Tg

Halogen-free and High-Tg grades combine, so a thick railway multilayer does not have to choose between compliance and thermal margin.

Halogen-free properties

[ Specification ]
Property Value Test / note
Bromine content < 900 ppm IEC 61249-2-21
Chlorine content < 900 ppm IEC 61249-2-21
Total Br + Cl < 1500 ppm Combined limit
Glass transition Tg 150 – 175 °C Standard and High-Tg grades both available
Td > 330 °C Comparable to High-Tg FR-4
Dk (1 GHz) 4.3 – 4.8 Slightly higher than standard FR-4
Water absorption 0.20 – 0.35 % Notably higher — this drives the handling rules
Flammability UL 94 V-0 Achieved without halogenated retardant

Guide values for pre-selection. Binding values are confirmed per project against your data.

Typical applications

[ Use cases ]
Rolling stock control and traction electronics
Tunnel and station infrastructure systems
Passenger information and lighting units
Building services in public infrastructure
Products under corporate environmental policy
Consumer electronics with eco-label requirements

Design rules

[ Layout ]

The points below are what most often comes back as a query after data review. Settling them before layout freeze saves a loop.

01

Bake before soldering

These laminates absorb roughly twice the moisture of standard FR-4. After more than a few weeks of storage, bake before reflow — trapped moisture flashes to steam and delaminates the board.

02

Store sealed with desiccant

Vacuum packing with a humidity indicator is not over-caution here, it is the normal handling regime. Boards left open on a shelf for a month will need baking.

03

Do not assume EN 45545-2 automatically

Halogen-free is a material property; EN 45545-2 is a tested classification of the finished assembly at a hazard level. Tell us the required HL level so we choose a laminate with the right evidence.

04

Expect slightly higher Dk

The mineral fillers raise the dielectric constant a little. On an impedance-controlled build this changes the stack-up calculation — mention the material when you send target impedances.

Design note Halogen-free laminates absorb more moisture. Bake before soldering, especially after longer storage.

Frequently asked

[ FAQ ]
Is halogen-free the same as RoHS compliant?

No, and they are often confused. RoHS restricts lead, cadmium, mercury and a handful of other substances; it says nothing about bromine in flame retardants. Practically all our material is RoHS compliant. Halogen-free is a separate, additional requirement.

What does it cost?

Around 10 – 25 % over standard FR-4, depending on grade and availability. Combined with High-Tg the surcharges roughly stack.

Does it perform worse?

Thermally and mechanically it is comparable to standard FR-4, and High-Tg grades are comparable to High-Tg FR-4. The two real differences are moisture uptake and a slightly higher Dk.

Do I need it for automotive?

Not usually — IATF 16949 does not require it. Some manufacturers specify it under their own environmental policy, so check the customer specification rather than the standard.

Related

[ Cross-reference ]

Does this fit your project?

Send us your data or a rough sketch. We check feasibility, name the cost drivers and answer within one working day.